Spain’s Constitutional Court makes no concessions to Catalonia over referendum bill
Judges turn down appeal to reconsider suspension of a ruling enabling pro-independence parties to pass laws on a single reading
Judges turn down appeal to reconsider suspension of a ruling enabling pro-independence parties to pass laws on a single reading
Spanish president says the bill is “absolutely illegal” and dismisses it as a blow to democracy
Rajoy will set up an extraordinary meeting if the Catalan Parliament Bureau admits the referendum law
Government spokesman calls court’s stance ‘political and legal indecency’ and vows defense of amendment’s constitutionality
Spanish Government appeal in court suspends the reform to fast-track the referendum on self-determination in Catalonia
JxSí and CUP-Crida Constituent resort to ‘fast-track’ legislation in Catalan parliament to register bill for October 1 vote on self-determination
Sector representatives ask Parliament to approve a new digital levy after Spain’s Constitutional Court overturned Catalan audiovisual tax earlier this month
Non-unanimous court decision means authorities to lose €20.5m intended to boost Catalonia’s audiovisual sector
A fortnight after dockworkers call off industrial action, EU Court of Justice calls Spanish government’s failure to liberalize ports ‘serious’
Catalonia’s top court upholds Prosecutor’s charges against Borràs and Esteve arguing need for investigation into evidence of criminal activity
Judges ban rules calling for more Catalan in film dubbing, education for new migrants and customer service
Judges ban rules calling for more Catalan in film dubbing, education for new migrants and customer service
The case against Montse Venturòs, the Mayor of Berga, for not taking down the Catalan pro-independence flag from the City Hall building during elections has been reopened. Although Berga’s trial court decided not to pursue the case last March after considering that exhibiting the Catalan pro-independence flag was not “an act of propaganda” nor disobedience, the court has now accepted the appeal presented by the Public Prosecutor asking for the case to be reopened. Venturós lawyer and party colleague Benet Salellas from pro-independence CUP said that reopening the case proved “how deeply politicized the Spanish justice is and how legal procedures are the main battering ram against the pro-independence movement and the democratic demands of Catalan citizens”.
Lluís Corominas and Ramona Barrufet, MPs from the liberal PDeCAT party and members of the Parliament Bureau, testified before the court this Friday in relation to the debate on independence in the Chamber that they allowed to take place. They are accused of disobedience and perversion of justice, the same crimes which Parliament’s President, Carme Forcadell and two other members of the Chamber are accused of. Corominas and Barrufet appealed to the principle of parliamentary immunity which says they cannot be sued. On Monday, Forcadell and the Parliament’s first secretary, Anna Simó, used the same argument when they testified before the High Court. The last member of the Parliament Bureau to be brought before the court will be Joan Josep Nuet, an MP from the alternative left coalition ‘Catalunya Sí que es Pot’. He is due to testify on June 12.
The Spanish Constitutional Court (TC) has unanimously suspended a substantial part of the Catalan law for popular non-binding referenda, approved seven years ago in 2010. In particular, the magistrates have annulled the section which refers to calling a referendum at an autonomic level. They believe that this kind of referendum “is not foreseen in the Spanish Constitution nor in the State’s legislation”. Moreover, the TC has also decided to suspend the creation of the National Transition Advisory Council, a body created through a Catalan Government decree and aimed at beginning the necessary measures for completing Catalonia’s pro-independence process. In this fashion, the TC accepted the appeal presented by the Spanish Government, which claimed that the Catalan law for non-binding referenda was unconstitutional.