Sagrada Familia to invest €36m in area transport
The amount is to be paid over ten years to help with mobility and urbanization of the neighborhood
The Sagrada Familia, Antoni Gaudì’s still-unfinished modernist masterpiece, is one of Barcelona’s top tourist attractions – which in turn makes the central neighborhood around the church one of the most crowded in the city.
To combat this, the church has pledged to invest 36 million euros over 10 years to improve mobility, urbanization, and the upkeeping of the public space. Of that amount, 22 million euros will be destined specifically to help finance public transport to match the high-intensity use around the church.
Set to be completed by 2026, the Sagrada Familia has been under construction for 133 years so far – and for this entire time, it hasn’t had a proper license. Inasmuch, Barcelona mayor Ada Colau announced that, by the first trimester of 2019, the license will be “completely regularized.” Having met with the head of the church’s Board of Construction, Colau deemed the day as “historic” and highlighted the “will” of both parties to take this “step.”
Colau also said that the two parties are "here, taking shared responsibility of the city’s heritage, of a well-loved icon, and also of the impact generated by these visits that our city likes so much." But the meeting, while having made some ground, was not hailed by all as a success.
The biggest dispute remains to be resolved. One element of Gaudì’s original plans, if ultimately built, would mean demolishing residential buildings: a large stairway leading to what will be the church entrance. This, not touched upon in the latest agreement, has been contested by local residents and the city.
The spokesperson for the Sagrada Familia Neighbor Association, Joan Itxaso, criticized the agreement for excluding the issue. “One cannot elude the fundamental problem of the finalization of the church,” he said. Itxaso also denounced that the agreement was made without the participation of the local residents, expressing that the City Council prioritized “the interest of a private entity” over the “needs” of the city.